China Establishes Digital Energy Fortress: Strategic Classification of National Data Introduced with Level 4 Protection for “Fundamental Data” that Impacts Political Security

In the global landscape where cybersecurity is inextricably linked with geopolitical stability, China's National Energy Administration (NEA) has responded firmly by promulgating the "Measures for Data Security Management in the Energy Sector (Trial)".

The energy sector is at the heart of a dual transition: on one hand, the escalation of cyber threats, and on the other, the acceleration towards the integration of advanced technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI). This dual dynamic significantly increases the complexity of data management and, consequently, the surface area exposed to risks of illicit acquisition and attacks.

The "Measures for Data Security Management," issued on December 8, 2025 , are intended to comprehensively standardize data processing activities in the energy sector, with a critical focus on risk prevention. The regulation, which will enter into force on July 1∘, 2026 , and will be valid for five years , represents the first specific regulatory document for the energy sector implementing the Data Security Law of the People's Republic of China.

GettyImages

The Geopolitical Imperative: Defending Critical Infrastructure

The context in which these Measures are introduced is dominated by the increasing militarization of cyberspace, with state actors increasingly targeting national power grids and other critical infrastructures for purposes extending beyond mere espionage, aiming instead at destabilization and coercion. The energy sector is vital for the national economy and essential livelihoods. The aim of the Measures is clear: to safeguard national security and development interests, while also protecting the legitimate rights and interests of individuals and organizations.

The Strategic Data Classification and Protection Requirements

The cornerstone of the regulation is the establishment of a three-tiered classification system for energy sector data, based on the potential impact of its compromise: General, Important (or Critical), and Fundamental (or Essential). This categorization is key to defining the scope of required protection measures.

Important Data refers to data that, if altered or disclosed, could directly jeopardize national security, economic activities, social stability, and public health and safety. The bar is raised significantly with Fundamental Data. This is defined as Important Data that achieves such a high coverage, accuracy, scale, and depth in a specific sector that its illegal use or sharing could have a direct impact on political security. Such data includes information related to key areas of national security and the backbone of the national economy.

This distinction mandates drastically different security requirements. For data processing activities using computer networks, network security level protection requirements must be implemented. Networks storing or processing Critical Data must meet or exceed Level 3 protection requirements , while those managing Fundamental Data, if they do not involve critical information infrastructure, must implement the Level 4 network security protection requirements. Furthermore, the comprehensive use of technologies such as encryption, authentication, identification, desensitization, verification, and auditing is mandatory to protect Important Data throughout its lifecycle. For Fundamental Data, the regulation specifically encourages the priority use of commercial cryptography and products and services that are "safe and trustworthy".

Responsibilities, Cataloging, and Continuous Monitoring

The regulation establishes a clear delineation of responsibilities. The NEA is responsible for overall supervision and dynamic data security management, including developing classification standards and reviewing the Important Data catalog. Provincial energy authorities are responsible for supervision in their respective regions, tasked with compiling and annually updating the regional Important Data catalog.

The Energy Data Processor holds the primary obligation. Processors of Important and Fundamental Data bear the primary responsibility for their own data security. The legal representative or the head of the organization is the first person responsible, while the Data Security Officer is the directly responsible person. They must identify and compile the Important Data catalog for their unit and submit it to the provincial energy authority where the data carrier is located. Critically, if significant changes occur to the data level or security status, the catalog must be resubmitted within three months.

Two crucial mechanisms for continuous supervision are risk assessment and the establishment of working systems:

• Risk Assessment. Processors of Critical Data are obliged to conduct risk assessments of their data processing activities at least once a year. The assessment focuses on the legality of the processing, the identification of Important and Fundamental Data, and the implementation of the data security management system.

• Log Management. Logging necessary for data security must be maintained for data processing activities. Logs related to security incident handling and tracing must be retained for at least one year. Where Important Data is involved in provisioning, entrusted processing, or joint processing, logs must be retained for no less than three years.

  
  

Managing Transfer and Emergency Response

The regulation addresses the sensitive issues related to data transfer, particularly in the international context. Important Data collected and generated in China that needs to be provided abroad is subject to the obligation to declare a data export security assessment in accordance with the law. For Fundamental Data, even sharing between different legal entities within the country is strictly regulated, requiring a risk assessment organized by the NEA or relevant departments if the cumulative amount reaches a threshold of 30% or more of the previous year's static total.

Another vital section is dedicated to data security monitoring, early warning, and emergency response. Upon discovering data security flaws or vulnerabilities, data processors must adopt corrective measures immediately. When a data security incident occurs, immediate measures must be taken, affected users must be informed promptly, and a report must be submitted to the provincial energy authority. Provincial authorities and central energy enterprises must report significant or particularly significant risks or events that directly endanger national security to the National Energy Administration within one working day of discovery.

The AI+ Accelerator and the Increased Risk Surface

Reinforcing the sense of urgency that led to the creation of this data security framework is the simultaneous push for innovation promoted by the NEA. The Notice on Organizing and Implementing "Artificial Intelligence+" Energy Pilot Projects, published shortly before on November 25, 2025 , aims to explore and form a new integrated development paradigm between energy and AI.

This program encourages energy enterprises to submit "high-value application scenarios" in sectors ranging across power grid, coal, nuclear, oil and gas, and new energy. The objective is to solve long-term industry pain points, reducing costs, improving efficiency, reducing carbon emissions, and ensuring safety, by leveraging the transformative potential of AI. These pilot projects, selected through a "challenge-based" approach and designed to create comprehensive and replicable solutions , inevitably require opening up environments and sharing crucial resources, including data and computing capabilities.

The massive introduction of AI into the core of energy operations generates huge volumes of data, much of which will undoubtedly fall into the Important and Fundamental categories, especially when AI is used for electricity system scheduling or autonomous decision-making in mining systems. In this context, the magnitude of risks and the potential for critical data acquisition are increased exponentially. The Data Security Management Measures, therefore, are not a delayed response, but the essential regulatory guardrail needed to enable the bold innovation promoted by the AI+ program, ensuring that the drive for efficiency does not compromise political stability and national security.

The Ultimate Consequences: Supervision and Legal Offence

The regulatory framework culminates in Chapter Five, dedicated to Supervision and Legal Responsibility. The NEA and provincial energy authorities are granted supervisory and inspection powers. If significant risks are discovered, authorities can hold talks with data processors and require them to adopt rectification measures.

The most severe measure is found in Article 34, where the violation of regulatory requirements is directly linked to the national sanctioning system. Any violation is managed and punished in accordance with the Data Security Law, the Cybersecurity Law, and the Personal Information Protection Law. The most severe clause pertains to criminal prosecution: "if a crime is constituted, the case will be transferred to the judicial authorities for criminal prosecution in accordance with the law". This establishes an extremely high regime of legal responsibility, potentially turning a failure in protecting critical energy data into a criminal charge for the responsible individuals and executives.

The "Measures for Data Security Management in the Energy Sector (Trial)" establish a multi-layered defense doctrine, assigning clear legal responsibilities and providing authorities with powerful tools for monitoring and response, thereby placing the protection of energy data at the core of national security strategy.