OSINT: China Unveils the 'Stealth Factory' J-35. Calculated Production Rate Exposes New Naval Threat

by Gabriele and Nicola Iuvinale

Objective: To assess the strategic implications of the accelerating Chinese military production, specifically calculating the estimated output rate of the fifth-generation J-35 stealth fighter using Open Source Intelligence (OSINT).

Methodology: The analysis leverages recent, rare public disclosures of J-35 assembly line imagery by Chinese state-controlled media (CCTV) and military sources. Production projections were calculated based on publicly stated annual targets and observed serial numbering.

Findings: Initial production estimates suggest the capacity to manufacture a single J-35 in approximately 7.3 days (50 aircraft/year). Long-term goals aim for 2.4 to 3.6 days per aircraft (100–150 aircraft/year). This rapid tempo is facilitated by China's national self-sufficiency in component and rare-earth production, contrasting sharply with the global logistical complexity and chronic delivery delays (up to 238 days in 2024) facing the US F-35 program.

Strategic Implications: The fast, high-volume deployment of the J-35—a versatile twin-engine fighter (CATOBAR/STOBAR) designed for integration with unmanned aircraft (Loyal Wingman)—signals China’s shift from a defensive to an offensive/projective military posture. China aims to challenge U.S. air and naval superiority in the Pacific and compete fiercely in the global stealth market, placing significant pressure on Western deterrence capabilities.

OSINT Analysis: The Stealth Factory Operates at Forced Pace

Chinese sources and state TV (CCTV) have publicly showcased an image worth more than a thousand maneuvers: the assembly line of the fifth-generation J-35 stealth fighter. Analysis of open-source data (OSINT) and stated projections from the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation manufacturer reveals an industrial acceleration that cannot be ignored by Western military planning.

The Mathematics of the Threat: Calculating Production Time

The cameras, which proudly displayed the production line, captured an Air Force J-35A with the presumed serial number '3557'. Although China does not provide an exact production schedule, the declared goal is highly telling:

Production Phase	Estimated Annual Production Rate	Time Required for One J-35
Initial/Ramp-up Phase	50 aircraft per year	Approximately 7.3 days per aircraft
Full Capacity Target	100 - 150 aircraft per year	Between 2.4 and 3.6 days per aircraft

The implication is clear: China aims to build a massive stealth fighter fleet not in decades, but in a few years. A production rate of one aircraft every two and a half days would strain the assembly lines of any global power and allow Beijing to rapidly equip all its aircraft carriers.

Industrial Comparison: Chinese Self-Reliance vs. Western Complexity

The calculated production rate for the J-35 isn't just a number—it’s a direct indicator of China's industrial and logistical structure, which sharply contrasts with the challenges faced by the U.S. F-35 program.

China is able to sustain such an aggressive build rate thanks to its strategy of national self-sufficiency. OSINT sources highlight that Beijing produces nearly all components domestically and, crucially, maintains control over the rare earth elements essential for advanced avionics and aeronautical manufacturing. This reduces dependency on external supply chains and drastically cuts logistical delays.

In contrast, the F-35 program contends with global logistical complexity that slows its cadence:

• Chronic Delays: In 2024, no F-35s were delivered on time, with the average delay reaching 238 days.

• Technical Complexity: The production process is compounded by the constant need to integrate critical software upgrades (like Block 4) and the involvement of global manufacturing facilities (such as Fort Worth, USA, and Cameri, Italy).

• Full Rate Only Now: The F-35 was only recently authorized for full-rate production, more than two decades after its initial contract.

China's ability to quickly transition to pulsating mass production of the J-35 highlights a critical advantage: its integrated industrial architecture provides a speed and resilience that the F-35 program, though technologically superior in some respects, cannot match in terms of throughput and delivery schedules.

Military Relevance: The J-35’s Strategic Advantage

The J-35 isn't just another aircraft; it’s a technological and strategic bridge:

• Total Naval Tactical Flexibility: The twin-engine design (powered by WS-19 or WS-21 engines, depending on the variant) is hailed as superior for power and safety—a clear jab at the single-engine F-35. Crucially, the J-35’s capability to launch via both electromagnetic catapult (CATOBAR, like on the Fujian carrier) and ski-jump (STOBAR, like on Liaoning and Shandong) ensures that the entire Chinese carrier fleet can be immediately fitted with stealth capabilities.

• Transition to 6th Generation Warfare (Manned-Unmanned Teaming): China is designing the J-35 as a "Loyal Wingman" to command drone swarms, such as the Attack-21. This focus on Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) is the hallmark of the next generation of air and naval warfare, positioning China at the cutting edge of development.

• Aggressive Deterrence and Projection: Beijing's message signals an explicit paradigm shift: the production capacity of aircraft like the J-35 indicates a move from defensive to offensive capabilities. The goal is to exert proactive deterrence that, according to their statements, will see the J-35 flying over Guam and Type 055 destroyers operating off the U.S. East Coast, reshaping the power balance and "pushing back U.S. forces in the Eastern Pacific."

In summary, the OSINT analysis of the J-35 production line is not just technical data; it is tangible evidence that China is rapidly building the capacity to militarily support its territorial claims and project force far beyond its territorial waters.

Photo