China's Expanding Military Footprint: Presence and Strategy in the Red Sea, Mediterranean, and North Africa - Report

I. Executive Summary

China's engagement in the Red Sea, Mediterranean, and North Africa represents a multifaceted and strategically driven expansion of its global influence. This report details the People's Republic of China's (PRC) evolving military presence, highlighting the pivotal role of its support base in Djibouti—the only confirmed overseas military installation—and its pervasive strategy of leveraging dual-use commercial port investments to facilitate military access and logistics. The analysis also covers the increasing frequency and strategic significance of naval deployments and joint exercises, particularly with Russia and Egypt, and the evolving nature of military cooperation and arms sales in North Africa. A central theme is China's long-term ambition to project power globally, secure critical maritime trade routes, and protect its burgeoning overseas interests, often presented under the guise of economic development or humanitarian missions. This comprehensive approach underscores a deliberate effort to reshape regional security dynamics and assert a more prominent role in global affairs.

GettyImages

II. Introduction: China's Evolving Global Military Strategy

Overview of China's "Active Defense" Posture and Blue-Water Capabilities

China's military strategy, characterized as "active defense," has undergone a profound transformation in recent decades. Historically focused on homeland defense and operations within "near sea waters," the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has expanded its strategic concept to encompass safeguarding national sovereignty and security far beyond its immediate borders. This evolution reflects a clear ambition to achieve "world-class military" status, signifying a fundamental redefinition of China's national security interests, extending them globally. This is not merely about defending existing borders but about protecting expanding economic interests and projecting influence in distant waters.   

The People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has been at the forefront of this strategic reorientation, undergoing substantial modernization programs. This includes a significant increase in the number of ships and the development of a robust, self-sufficient indigenous weapons industry. This modernization aligns with a long-term vision for naval growth, exemplified by Admiral Liu Huaqing's three-phase plan, which aims for the deployment of a global navy, including aircraft carriers, by 2050. The consistent investment in advanced naval platforms and the explicit goal of developing blue-water capabilities underscore a deliberate strategic progression from a purely defensive, territorial focus to one that encompasses global interests and power projection.   

The Nexus between the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and China's Military Objectives

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a vast global infrastructure and investment endeavor spanning over 150 countries, is explicitly recognized as a strategic tool to bolster China's military reach and geopolitical influence. The initiative's dual-use infrastructure, which includes ports, railways, and digital networks, significantly enhances China's power projection capabilities and secures vital supply lines globally. These investments also create potential footholds for the PLA, providing logistical access and operational flexibility in strategically important regions.   

The BRI is considered a centerpiece of President Xi Jinping's foreign policy and was incorporated into the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) constitution in 2017, underscoring its profound strategic importance. This initiative serves as a comprehensive, integrated platform for China's "major-country diplomacy," effectively blurring the lines between economic development, resource security, and military expansion. This allows China to establish a "Sino-centric sphere" by leveraging economic dependencies for geopolitical and military gains. The explicit statement that BRI bolsters military reach and power projection, combined with its status as a foreign policy centerpiece, indicates a deliberate strategy to build influence and access incrementally, rather than through overt military means, thereby reshaping global dynamics.   

Strategic Importance of the Red Sea, Mediterranean, and North Africa for China's Global Ambitions

The Red Sea, Mediterranean, and North Africa regions hold immense strategic importance for China's global ambitions. These areas collectively form a critical maritime corridor, serving as the final stage for the maritime Silk Road branch directed towards Western countries. This corridor links the Indian Ocean to the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, making it indispensable for global trade and, crucially, for China's energy supply channels.   

Beyond economic and energy security, China's presence in these regions supports its broader goal of protecting its citizens and investments abroad. This capability was notably demonstrated during the evacuation of 35,000 Chinese citizens from Libya in 2011 and over 600 from Yemen in 2015, highlighting the practical necessity of a permanent presence in the region to facilitate future emergency operations.   

III. The Red Sea: Djibouti and Beyond

A. The People's Liberation Army Support Base in Djibouti

Establishment and Purpose.The People's Liberation Army Support Base in Djibouti stands as China's first and currently only confirmed overseas military base. Constructed at a cost of US$590 million, the base commenced operations on August 1, 2017, following the start of construction in March 2016. Its primary stated purpose is to support military logistics for Chinese troops engaged in anti-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden. Additionally, it is intended to support peacekeeping operations, humanitarian aid, and disaster relief efforts in the region. The base also plays a critical role in facilitating non-combat evacuation operations, a capability China prioritized after large-scale evacuations from Libya in 2011 and Yemen in 2015. Beyond these publicly stated roles, the base is expected to engage in intelligence collection and counterterrorism efforts. It significantly bolsters the PLAN's ability to prevent piracy and provides convenient access for Chinese warships into the Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf, and Indian Ocean.   

Capabilities and Infrastructure. The Djibouti base is a heavily fortified facility, spanning 0.5 square kilometers (0.2 sq mi) and accommodating an estimated 1,000–2,000 personnel. It features a substantial underground space of 23,000 square meters, indicating extensive logistical and operational capacity. Key infrastructure includes a 400-meter runway with an air traffic control tower and a large helicopter apron, supporting air operations. A large-scale pier, over 330 meters (1,120 feet) in length, was completed in December 2019. This pier is reportedly long enough to accommodate the PLAN's two new aircraft carriers and other large warships, or at least four nuclear-powered submarines. Satellite analysis further suggests that China may be constructing a second pier, indicating a continuous expansion of its naval capacity at the base.   

Strategic Significance. The Djibouti base markedly enhances China's power projection capabilities in the Horn of Africa and the broader Indian Ocean region, thereby significantly improving the PLAN's blue-water capabilities. This installation represents a pivotal shift for the PLA, moving beyond its traditional focus on homeland defense to actively protecting burgeoning Chinese interests overseas. Its close proximity to the U.S. Camp Lemonnier facility in Djibouti has raised concerns among U.S. officials regarding potential monitoring of counterterrorism operations in the region. The Djibouti base, while initially framed as a logistics and anti-piracy hub, is clearly designed for multi-functional power projection, including intelligence gathering and accommodating large naval assets. This indicates a strategic intent far beyond its stated defensive purposes, serving as a critical node for China's expanding global reach. The extensive, high-capacity infrastructure, such as the pier capable of berthing aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines, along with the large underground space and documented intelligence collection capabilities, points to a more ambitious, long-term strategic role for the base in projecting power and influence across critical maritime zones.   

B. Dual-Use Port Investments in the Red Sea Region

Overview of Chinese Firm Involvement. A significant concern surrounding China's expansive port development in Africa is the possibility of repurposing commercial ports for military activities. China's development of Djibouti's Doraleh Port, initially marketed as a purely commercial venture, was extended to accommodate a naval facility in 2017, serving as a model for potential future arrangements elsewhere on the continent. Chinese state-owned firms are active stakeholders—as builders, financiers, or operators—in an estimated 78 ports across 32 African countries. Many of these ports possess specifications that allow them to berth PLA Navy vessels or accommodate them for port calls. Beyond direct development, Chinese firms also handle military logistics in numerous African ports; for instance, Chinese state-owned enterprise Hutchison Ports holds a 38-year concession from the Egyptian Navy to operate a terminal at the Abu Qir Naval Base.   

Strategic Value and Speculation. While concrete data on additional confirmed military bases beyond Djibouti remains limited, evidence suggests a broader strategy. Of the 78 African ports with Chinese firm involvement, 36 have already hosted PLA port calls or military exercises. This demonstrates that these ports possess the necessary design features to support Chinese naval flotillas, making them potential candidates for future PLA Navy bases. The Port of Sudan, strategically located along the Red Sea, has attracted considerable Chinese commercial and geopolitical interest, facilitating access to this vital maritime corridor. China's extensive investment in dual-use port infrastructure across Africa, particularly along the Red Sea, represents a deliberate "co-located commercial and military infrastructure strategy". This strategy provides Beijing with plausible deniability while incrementally expanding its logistical and potential basing options, creating a network of access points that could be militarized in a crisis. The consistent involvement of Chinese firms in port development, coupled with documented PLA naval activity at these facilities, strongly suggests a systematic effort to establish military access under the guise of commercial ventures. This allows for covert capability building and pre-positioning of logistical support without overt military declarations.   

The following table highlights selected African ports with Chinese firm involvement and documented PLA Navy activity, illustrating the pervasive nature of this dual-use strategy:

Table 1: Selected African Ports with Chinese Firm Involvement and PLA Navy Activity

Port Name	Country	Chinese Firm Involvement Type	Hosted PLA Port Calls/Drills	Dual-Use Potential/Speculation
Doraleh Port	Djibouti	Development, Extension	Yes	Confirmed naval facility adjacent to commercial port
Abu Qir Naval Base	Egypt	38-year concession (Hutchison Ports)	No (military logistics handling)	Chinese firm handles military logistics for Egyptian Navy
Port of Sudan	Sudan	Investment, Development	No	Facilitates access to vital Red Sea corridor; geopolitical interest
Kribi	Cameroon	66% stake (Chinese firms)	Yes	Design features support PLAN vessels; potential future base
Lekki Deep Sea Port	Nigeria	Public-private partnership, China Development Bank backed	Yes	Design features support PLAN vessels; potential future base
Port of Bata	Equatorial Guinea	Funding, Construction	No	Speculated potential future Chinese naval base
Autonomous Port of Nouakchott	Mauritania	Funded by China (two phases)	No	Dual-use potential speculated; long-term presence in West Africa
Dar es Salaam	Tanzania	Chinese firm involvement	Yes	Staging ground for PLA military exercises
Lagos	Nigeria	Chinese firm involvement	Yes	Staging ground for PLA military exercises
Durban	South Africa	Chinese firm involvement	Yes	Staging ground for PLA military exercises

C. Naval Operations and the Red Sea Crisis

Long-standing Anti-Piracy Operations. Since 2008, China has maintained a standing People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) task force in the Gulf of Aden, primarily for anti-piracy measures in response to piracy off the coast of Somalia. Initially, this task force was authorized to escort only Chinese and humanitarian ships, but its mandate later expanded to include commercial vessels from other countries. Djibouti served as a forward repair base for these operations as early as August 2009, predating the formal opening of China's military base there. The anti-piracy mission is jointly managed by the PLAN, the Ministry of Transport (MoT), and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA), operating under restrictive rules of engagement that primarily focus on deterrence rather than direct confrontation.   

China's Posture and Alleged Coordination with Houthi Forces during the Red Sea Crisis. During the recent Red Sea crisis, which saw Houthi forces attacking numerous merchant and naval vessels, Chinese social media platforms displayed nationalist support for the Houthis. More significantly, maritime tracking data and statements from Houthi officials confirmed that Chinese ships received "special treatment" and were not targeted in the conflict zone. This preferential treatment was reportedly the result of "careful diplomatic choreography" and direct coordination between Houthi leaders and Chinese officials. While overall shipping traffic through the Red Sea plummeted by nearly 70 percent since the attacks began, the proportion of China-linked tonnage has surged, creating an artificial competitive advantage for Chinese goods, which continued to flow unimpeded.   

Further evidence suggests a more direct involvement. U.S. Treasury sanctions have revealed that multiple Chinese firms, including Shenzhen Boyu Imports and Exports and Chang Guang Satellite Technology Co. Ltd. (CGSTL), supplied dual-use components such as missile and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) parts, and satellite imagery, which significantly bolstered Houthi capabilities and enabled precise strikes on U.S. naval assets. Chinese-origin hydrogen fuel cells and drone propellers have been recovered from Houthi drones used in shipping attacks. Despite Washington's repeated warnings, Beijing has maintained a "posture of strategic denial," providing the tools of war while feigning neutrality and vaguely calling for "relevant parties" to play "constructive" roles in maintaining stability. China's nuanced involvement in the Red Sea crisis, characterized by strategic denial while providing dual-use components and securing preferential treatment for its shipping, represents a sophisticated form of asymmetric geopolitical leverage. This allows China to exploit regional instability to its economic advantage and subtly undermine Western interests without direct military engagement, thereby reshaping maritime trade flows and influence. The documented preferential treatment for Chinese vessels amidst widespread attacks on Western shipping, combined with evidence of Chinese companies supplying critical components to the Houthis, indicates a deliberate strategy to benefit from and exacerbate regional instability. This approach allows China to gain economic and strategic advantage by disrupting competitors' maritime trade while maintaining plausible deniability.   

Implications for Maritime Security and Global Shipping. The Houthi attacks have severely impacted shipping destined for Israel and transit through the Suez Canal, forcing many vessels to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. This significantly increases journey times and costs, and has led to a notable decline in Suez Canal revenue.   

IV. The Mediterranean Sea: Growing Naval Visibility

A. Naval Deployments and Transit

The People's Republic of China has maintained a visible presence in the Mediterranean region for decades, primarily through its merchant marine frequently transiting the Suez Canal to access European markets. The PLAN's visible presence in the Mediterranean began as early as spring 2011 with the operation to extract 35,800 Chinese nationals from Libya, an operation that was repeated in 2015 for the evacuation of citizens from Yemen. These humanitarian operations served as early scenarios for China's visible naval presence in the region, demonstrating its nascent capability for distant operations.   

Since these initial humanitarian missions, Chinese naval vessels have routinely passed through the Mediterranean when headed to the Baltic Sea for combined maneuvers with the Russian Navy, often conducting exercises, including live fire, during transit. China's increasing naval presence in the Mediterranean, initially driven by humanitarian and anti-piracy missions, has evolved into routine transits and exercises, signaling a growing comfort and capability for sustained blue-water operations far from its immediate area of interest. This demonstrates a strategic progression from "soft power" (evacuation) to "hard power" projection. The shift from ad-hoc humanitarian missions to regular, complex exercises, including live fire, indicates a deliberate effort to normalize and enhance the PLAN's operational footprint and experience in strategically vital distant waters.   

B. Joint Naval Exercises

Joint Sea Series with Russia. China and Russia have conducted a series of significant joint naval exercises, most notably the "Joint Sea" series. From May 11 to 21, 2015, Chinese and Russian naval units conducted the "Joint Sea 2015" maneuvers in Eastern Mediterranean waters. This exercise involved Chinese frigates that had traveled from anti-piracy missions in the Gulf of Aden meeting with Russian ships, with the stated purpose of strengthening strategic coordination and enhancing their ability to jointly tackle security threats. Similar maneuvers were held in the Baltic in 2017 and 2018, with Chinese Navy ships transiting through the Mediterranean to participate. More recently, in late July 2024, Chinese naval vessels (part of the 46th escort task group) held a joint exercise with the Russian Navy in the Gulf of Finland, following a visit to St. Petersburg. These drills are part of a much larger operation spanning the Pacific, Arctic, Mediterranean, Baltic, and Caspian seas.   

Joint Exercises with Egypt. In August 2024, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy conducted a joint naval exercise with the Egyptian Navy in the Mediterranean Sea, specifically north of Alexandria. The exercise involved China's Type 052D guided-missile destroyer (Jiaozuo) and a Type 903A comprehensive replenishment ship (Honghu), which joined forces with Egypt's FREMM multipurpose frigate (Al-Galala). Training courses included communications coordination, formation maneuvering, and maritime replenishment positioning, with both navies taking turns to command. This exercise showcased the PLA Navy's strides toward blue-water operations and deepened friendships between the two navies.   

Broader Tri-lateral Drills. In a significant display of growing partnerships, China, Iran, and Russia conducted joint naval drills called "Maritime Security Belt 2025" in the Gulf of Oman in March 2025, near the strategic Strait of Hormuz. This exercise involved China's guided-missile destroyer Baotou and the comprehensive supply ship Gaoyouhu. Observers from several countries, including Azerbaijan, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and the United Arab Emirates, were present, indicating a broader effort to demonstrate a shift in regional security alignments. The increasing frequency and geographic scope of joint naval exercises, particularly with Russia, and increasingly with regional partners like Egypt and Iran, indicate a deliberate strategy by China to forge alternative security partnerships and challenge the existing Western-led maritime order. These exercises are not just about interoperability but are a strategic projection of power and a signal of a deepening anti-Western alliance. The multi-ocean scope of the exercises with Russia, and the inclusion of Iran in critical choke points, underscore a clear intent to build a coalition and demonstrate a shift in global security architecture, asserting a multi-polar security environment.   

The following table summarizes key joint naval exercises involving China in the Mediterranean and Red Sea regions:

Table 2: Key Joint Naval Exercises Involving China in the Mediterranean and Red Sea Regions

Exercise Name	Date(s)	Location	Key Participating Countries	Chinese Vessels Involved (if specified)	Stated Purpose	Strategic Significance/Implications
Joint Sea 2015	May 11-21, 2015	Eastern Mediterranean	Russia	Frigates Linyi and Weifang, Tanker Weishanhu	Strengthen strategic coordination; enhance joint security	Early demonstration of blue-water capability; deepening strategic partnership with Russia
Joint Exercise with Russian Navy	Late July 2024	Gulf of Finland (part of larger drills)	Russia	46th escort task group vessels (unspecified)	Defending sea communications and maritime economic zones	Part of extensive global drills; showcases long-distance operational capability and deepening alliance with Russia
Joint Naval Exercise with Egypt	August 2024	North of Alexandria, Mediterranean Sea	Egypt	Type 052D destroyer Jiaozuo, Type 903A replenishment ship Honghu	Communications coordination, formation maneuvering, maritime replenishment positioning	Demonstrates PLAN's blue-water strides; deepens friendships and pragmatic cooperation with regional partner
Maritime Security Belt 2025	March 11, 2025	Gulf of Oman (near Strait of Hormuz)	Iran, Russia	Guided-missile destroyer Baotou, comprehensive supply ship Gaoyouhu	Show of force in Middle East; enhance maritime security	Tri-lateral cooperation in strategic choke point; challenging Western dominance in critical waterways; building alternative security alliances

C. Dual-Use Port Investments in the Mediterranean

Chinese Involvement in Commercial Ports. China has invested over $30 billion in overseas port development globally, strategically gaining critical footholds in key geopolitical hotspots. These extensive projects are often part of a broader Chinese effort to secure Mediterranean logistics routes, which are vital for its global trade and supply chains. The dual-use nature of these port investments is a recurring theme, allowing China to leverage commercial ventures for potential strategic and military advantages.   

Specific Examples and Assessment. While direct military basing in the Mediterranean remains unconfirmed, China's commercial port investments provide valuable logistical access and intelligence opportunities. For instance, at Haifa Port in Israel, China built and partially operates the Bayport Terminal. Despite this significant investment, its use as a naval base is considered unlikely due to Israel's strong Western alliances. Nevertheless, this investment marks one of China's few major port investments in a high-income, NATO-aligned country, providing a unique form of presence and access. Similarly, China's investment in the Lekki Deep Sea Port in Nigeria was made through a public-private partnership backed by the China Development Bank. While not directly in the Mediterranean, this port is part of China's broader African port strategy that impacts access to the broader Atlantic-Mediterranean maritime system. The inherent dual-use nature of these port investments, coupled with China's broader strategic goals of securing logistics routes and collecting intelligence, means that even purely commercial operations contribute to a long-term strategy of influence and potential military access. This "foot in the door" strategy allows China to establish a presence and build relationships that could potentially be leveraged for military access or support in future scenarios, even if not for overt bases.   

V. North Africa: Military Cooperation and Arms Sales

A. Chinese Arms Exports to North Africa

Trends and Motivations: Africa has emerged as an increasingly important market for Chinese arms exports, with China transforming from a net importer to a net exporter of weapons since 2000. Between 2013 and 2017, Chinese weapons sales constituted 17% of African arms imports, representing a 55% increase from the preceding five-year period. Chinese weapons are particularly attractive to African nations due to their affordability and the absence of "strings attached," such as human rights contingencies, which are often part of American or European arms deals. China has sold weapons to 23 African countries, becoming the exporter of choice for several nations in Sub-Saharan Africa, with some receiving over 90% of their weaponry from China.   

However, China has largely "failed to break out of the low cost and low technology sector and into the North African market, Africa's largest market". North Africa's share of global arms imports fell by 62% between 2015–19 and 2020–24, and China accounted for only 1.2% of regional arms imports in 2020–24, a decrease from 3.0% in the previous period. The United States remains the top supplier to Middle East and North Africa (MENA) states, accounting for 50% of arms imports, followed by European nations. Despite this, China continues to export significant military hardware, including tanks, surface-to-air missiles, and unmanned aerial vehicles, to countries like Nigeria and Algeria. While China's arms sales market share in North Africa specifically has declined and remains low compared to Western suppliers, its broader strategy across Africa is not solely profit-driven. The sales, coupled with military aid and training, serve a long-term strategic objective of building influence, safeguarding Belt and Road Initiative projects, and establishing relationships that could be leveraged for future military access or support, even if not immediately leading to bases. The explicit statement that arms sales can "safeguard Chinese investment projects" and "give China leverage" and build "relationship-building opportunities" directly contradicts the idea of purely commercial motives, indicating a strategic, long-term approach to cultivating influence and access.   

B. Broader Military Engagement

China's comprehensive approach in Africa extends beyond arms sales to include increasing military cooperation through training programs, technology transfers, and joint exercises. Between 2017 and 2022, China provided $100 million in military aid to African nations, and during the same period, it exported three times as many weapons to Sub-Saharan Africa as the United States. Chinese troops have also utilized naval and land facilities built by Chinese firms for their drills, such as Tanzania's Kigamboni Naval Base and Ethiopia's Awash Arba War Technical School.   

These activities enhance China's foothold in regions like East Africa, potentially disrupting U.S. interests and future naval operations. Deepening military ties could allow China to deploy naval and air assets in key locations to secure its Indian Ocean trade routes and critical resources like oil in the event of a future conflict. China's military exercises with African states, such as "Peace Unity-2024" with Tanzania and Mozambique, represent another area of military cooperation with significant strategic consequences for the United States and its allies. China's comprehensive military engagement in Africa (arms sales, aid, training, exercises), often intertwined with BRI investments, creates a multi-layered framework for long-term strategic dominance and resource security. This strategy aims to cultivate dependency and influence, potentially enabling future military access or support along critical maritime corridors, even in the absence of overt bases beyond Djibouti. The combination of vast infrastructure investments through BRI and increasing military cooperation, including the use of Chinese-built facilities for PLA drills, reveals a cohesive, long-term strategy to secure resources, control trade routes, and build deep relationships that could provide future military leverage and access across the continent.   

VI. Strategic Implications and Future Outlook

A. Impact on Regional Security Dynamics

China's expanding presence fundamentally challenges existing security architectures, particularly in the Red Sea and Mediterranean, regions traditionally dominated by Western powers. Concerns from the United States and European powers are multifaceted, focusing on China's ability to collect vast amounts of intelligence via its port network, its potential to disrupt U.S. shipments during wartime, and its capacity to pre-position weapons, ammunition, and equipment to resupply warships or rapidly establish anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) nodes near major maritime choke points. Regional actors, such as India, view the expansion of Chinese naval operations and the establishment of bases as disrupting the regional maritime strategic balance, which negatively impacts their own security interests. China's strategy of leveraging dual-use infrastructure and cultivating partnerships through military cooperation and arms sales is a deliberate, long-term approach to incrementally reshape regional security dynamics. This creates a "strategic trap" for traditional powers, forcing them to adapt to a new, more complex geopolitical landscape where China's influence is steadily increasing without direct confrontation. The ability to gain economic advantage during crises, as observed in the Red Sea, and to build potential military access points under commercial guise demonstrates a sophisticated, indirect challenge to the status quo, compelling other powers to react to China's growing influence on its own terms.   

B. China's Long-Term Objectives

China's military expansion in these regions is not episodic but forms part of a grand strategy to achieve its long-term objectives. These objectives include becoming a "world-class military" by 2049, coinciding with the centennial of the People's Republic of China's founding. This involves vigorously strengthening "comprehensive long-sea support capabilities" and improving the construction of naval bases globally. The overarching strategy aims to secure critical resources and control key trade routes, thereby creating a framework for long-term strategic dominance. The integration of the Maritime Silk Road with China's asserted control of the South China Sea and its BRI ports creates a "contiguous influence belt" that extends its reach across vital maritime corridors. This aims to fundamentally alter the global power balance by reducing reliance on U.S.-patrolled sea lines of communication and challenging the efficacy of traditional blockade strategies. The explicit goals of insulating from U.S. maritime influence and diversifying supply routes reveal a strategic aim to mitigate vulnerabilities and assert greater control over global trade and resource flows, thereby reshaping the international power structure.   

C. Challenges and Opportunities for International Actors

The opaque financing mechanisms and the exploitation of local corruption associated with BRI projects often obscure the PRC's true intent, posing significant counterintelligence and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) challenges for other nations. The sheer scale and adaptability of the BRI signal a "generational challenge" for U.S. planners, requiring a fundamental rethinking of existing strategies. For Western powers, a key challenge lies in distinguishing between legitimate commercial endeavors and dual-use military applications, and in formulating responses that do not inadvertently alienate partner nations in Africa and the Middle East. Navigating this complex landscape requires a nuanced understanding of China's integrated economic and military strategy.   

VII. Conclusion

China's military presence in the Red Sea, Mediterranean, and North Africa is a multifaceted and strategically driven endeavor, integral to its broader global ambitions. This report has demonstrated that China's footprint extends significantly beyond its singular confirmed military base in Djibouti. It encompasses a pervasive network of dual-use port investments, increasingly sophisticated naval deployments and joint exercises, and strategic military cooperation and arms sales across the continent.

The Djibouti base, while ostensibly a logistics and anti-piracy hub, is equipped with capabilities far exceeding these stated purposes, serving as a critical node for multi-functional power projection. Concurrently, China's extensive investments in commercial ports across Africa, particularly along the Red Sea, are part of a deliberate strategy to establish a network of potential military access points under the guise of economic development. This approach provides Beijing with plausible deniability while incrementally expanding its logistical and potential basing options.

In the Mediterranean, China's naval visibility has evolved from humanitarian missions to routine transits and complex joint exercises, particularly with Russia and increasingly with regional partners like Egypt and Iran. These exercises are not merely about interoperability but represent a strategic projection of power and a signal of deepening alternative security partnerships, challenging the existing Western-led maritime order. In North Africa, while China's arms sales market share remains modest compared to Western suppliers, its broader military engagement, including aid, training, and the use of Chinese-built facilities, aims to cultivate long-term influence and access along critical maritime corridors.

Ultimately, China's activities in these regions are integral to its "active defense" posture, its Belt and Road Initiative, and its long-term ambition to become a global blue-water naval power. The goal is to secure critical maritime corridors, protect its burgeoning overseas interests, and fundamentally reshape the international security landscape by reducing reliance on U.S.-patrolled sea lines of communication and challenging traditional blockade strategies. These developments necessitate continued vigilance and a nuanced understanding from international actors to navigate the evolving geopolitical realities and their profound implications for global maritime security.